<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Amorian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amorian.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amorian.org</link>
	<description>The Love of Freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:04:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Jefferson on intergenerational debt</title>
		<link>http://www.amorian.org/2010/02/07/jefferson-on-intergenerational-debt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.amorian.org/2010/02/07/jefferson-on-intergenerational-debt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inherited debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John W. Eppes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Jefferson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amorian.org/?p=2284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas Jefferson discussed the idea of intergenerational government debt in a letter to John W. Eppes, June 24, 1813.  In summary, he says intergenerational debt is contrary to Natural Law.  One generation should not be expected to inherit and pay the governmental debts of a previous generation.
This writing seems highly appropriate and relevant [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.amorian.org/2010/02/07/jefferson-on-intergenerational-debt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>36th cause for impeachment added to The Big List</title>
		<link>http://www.amorian.org/2010/02/04/36th-cause-for-impeachment-added-to-the-big-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.amorian.org/2010/02/04/36th-cause-for-impeachment-added-to-the-big-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amorian.org/?p=2274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I added another reason for impeachment to The Big List (the tab at the top). 
31. He has misapplied America&#8217;s military for his own political puposes.
Obama sent a large number of US soldiers into Afghanistan to perform in roles that did not match their training.  He did this for political reasons in the US.  This put our [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.amorian.org/2010/02/04/36th-cause-for-impeachment-added-to-the-big-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Jefferson and God</title>
		<link>http://www.amorian.org/2010/02/03/on-jefferson-and-god/</link>
		<comments>http://www.amorian.org/2010/02/03/on-jefferson-and-god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 06:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Deism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Declaration of Independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exploratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirituality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apriarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rational christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thomas b parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Jefferson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unitarian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amorian.org/?p=2253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found a copy of the original letter on an Apriarian sect here: http://memory.loc.gov/master/mss/mtj/mtj1/051/0500/0555.jpg. 
This is addressed to Thomas B. Parker. My transcription is as follows.  I hope I got it right: 
Monticello May 15, 1819
I thank you, Sir, for the pamphlet you have been so kind as to send me on the reveries, not say insanities of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.amorian.org/2010/02/03/on-jefferson-and-god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The remarkable courage of Sarah Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.amorian.org/2010/02/03/the-remarkable-courage-of-sarah-palin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.amorian.org/2010/02/03/the-remarkable-courage-of-sarah-palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bomber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underwear bomber]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amorian.org/?p=2249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m always surprised by the courage a Sarah Palin for standing up as a conservative leader.  A lot of people don&#8217;t get this.  They see her taking in thousands of dollars, and then calling it greed.  It isn&#8217;t.  It&#8217;s safety.  Let&#8217;s put this into perspective. 
Sarah Palin is a public figure.  She is the kind of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.amorian.org/2010/02/03/the-remarkable-courage-of-sarah-palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vermont&#8217;s secessionist movement: Good in theory.  Bad in reality.</title>
		<link>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/31/vermonts-secessionist-movement-good-in-theory-bad-in-reality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/31/vermonts-secessionist-movement-good-in-theory-bad-in-reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classic Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fragmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[o-men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secessionist campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secessionist movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seditioninst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state's rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usurers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington dc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white house]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amorian.org/?p=2240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time.com has an article about Vermont&#8217;s secessionist movement:  The Secessionist Campaign for the Republic of Vermont.  The members have some right ideas, and some not so right ideas.
They strongly support state&#8217;s rights.  They recognize that liberal statism is corrupting and undesired.  The article describes the movement as &#8220;left-libertarian, anti-big government, anti-empire, antiwar, with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/31/vermonts-secessionist-movement-good-in-theory-bad-in-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mandatory Reading for Conservatives: The Misesian Vision</title>
		<link>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/30/mandatory-reading-for-conservatives-the-misesian-vision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/30/mandatory-reading-for-conservatives-the-misesian-vision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amorian.org/?p=2236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lew Rockwell has posted a brilliant piece on conservatism and American values.  It is the text of a speech delivered at the Jeremy Davis Mises Circle in Houston, Texas, on January 23, 2010.  
Rockwell neatly summarizes most of what I&#8217;ve been saying in this blog in one simple speech.  It is a must-read for conservatives. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/30/mandatory-reading-for-conservatives-the-misesian-vision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another symbol for Deism, this from Thomas Jefferson</title>
		<link>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/22/another-symbol-for-deism-this-from-thomas-jefferson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/22/another-symbol-for-deism-this-from-thomas-jefferson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Deism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirituality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apriarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deism Symbol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eagle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hemlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honey bee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honeycomb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motif]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[owl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socrates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thomas b parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Jefferson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amorian.org/?p=2216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter once to Thomas B. Parker in which he considers proper religion.  He said: 
Were I to be the founder of a new sect, I would call them Apriarians, and after the example of the bees advise them to extract the honey of every sect. My fundamental principle would be the reverse [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/22/another-symbol-for-deism-this-from-thomas-jefferson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What conservatism is</title>
		<link>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/22/what-conservatism-is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/22/what-conservatism-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exploratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservativsm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Founders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left-wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leftism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leftist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maoism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overthrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radical religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious statism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right-wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rightism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rightist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secular statism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amorian.org/?p=2209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since I write about conservatism, I thought I would clarify what I mean by the word &#8220;conservative.&#8221; There are probably as many ways to define conservatism as there are people, so I am not making a claim to be the final authority on the subject.  In this blog I&#8217;m going to stick with a simple [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/22/what-conservatism-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the conservatives will take Congress in 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/20/why-the-conservatives-will-take-congress-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/20/why-the-conservatives-will-take-congress-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Miluski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Bennett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Byron Dorgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Dodd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Inouye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Vitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Armey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Bayh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George LeMieux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Voinovich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Ried]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Bunning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Thune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Isakson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judd Gregg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kit Bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bennet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Crapo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Leahy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patty Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reelection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Burr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roland Burris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Wyden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russ Fiengold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Brownback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Kaufman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Coburn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amorian.org/?p=2202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night after the Massachusetts special election I did an estimate of what the congressional election results will look like in 2010.  It looks like the House will be taken by the Republicans, and there is a really good chance they will take the Senate as well.
This afternoon I heard Dick Armey on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/20/why-the-conservatives-will-take-congress-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay &#8220;Rights&#8221;: Human nature cannot be changed by legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/17/gay-rights-human-nature-cannot-be-changed-by-legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/17/gay-rights-human-nature-cannot-be-changed-by-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amorian.org/?p=2198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The liberal attempts to create gay marriage through legislation are doomed to fail.  Gay marriage just doesn&#8217;t happen in nature.  There are few if any examples of cultures that have gay marriage, while straight marriage is found in most or all cultures.  The human tendency for straight marriage comes from human nature, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.amorian.org/2010/01/17/gay-rights-human-nature-cannot-be-changed-by-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
