The best story this decade about the fraud of global warming has the rather boring title:
The Mathematics of Global Warming, by Peter Landesman.
Landesman is a mathematician who specializes in a type of mathematics called non-linear differential equations. The global warming models are all based on non-linear differential equations. Landesman has authority when discussing the models.
We have all heard that the main problem of the global warming theory is the fact that the models are wrong. They have a fundamental flaw. Historically, they have done a bad job predicting what the climate will do. Half the time the climate model’s predictions are wrong. They just don’t do a good job predicting the future of the climate.
In this article, Landesman goes into the reasons why the climate models not only don’t work, but can’t work. The models are flawed to the core.
The story about the Climategate emails is interesting, but they are only a side story. The models are flawed to the core, so all of the “proofs” that global warming is happening will turn out to be fraudulent.
If you want to read more on the Climategate scandal, I would recommend:
Caught Green-Handed! by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, November 30, 2009.
If you want to read more on another Climategate scandal, look to New Zealand and this article.
NASA’s data “proves” that global warming is happening. Look for the scientists there to do massive CYA because another scandal will be coming from there. It is inevitable. I read somewhere that the East Anglia scientist still believe in global warming because their results match the results at places like NASA. Well… If the East Anglia results look the way they do because the data was tweaked, that all but proves that the NASA data has also been tweaked.
The cause of the climate research distortions of course is money. If you follow the money trail, it becomes obvious that the way research is financed is a major cause of the distortions.
Without going into the technical reasons why, I believe that the increase in “greenhouse” gasses will eventually be shown to cause a minor, but measurable, increase in temperatures close to the ground. Think tree height. Think about one degree, if that. And desert areas will have the greatest temperature increases. But the overall temperature will change very little.
Stumble it!
2 users commented in " The best story this year for exposing global warming fraud "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackGreat article! I am a pretty strong environmentalist in my own way, and *used* to be all on-board the green movement.
I still think there is a lot of good we can do that makes sense and doesn't risk our future — such as learning to stop using so much fertilizer in our yards, or driving more economical cars if our situations permit it, or learning to be happy living in a bit smaller home like our grandparents.
But it's become clear to me over the last few years that the Al Gore's of this world hi-jacked the original environmentalist message and are using it to grab power and money.
This article only helps drive that point home for me. Good job!
In my life I don't have time to always read lengthy complex cross-posted articles. Your site is one I read fairly regularly, though; so, if you have the inclination, I would enjoy future articles from you *summing* the main points in the cross-posted articles above (or others you feel are pertinent) — something with a little more meat than this post, but needing less effort to digest it than the original sources.
Or not. :)
Thank you for your feedback. I appreciate it.
I'll try to do summaries of the articles. Unfortunately I'm usually constrained by time, so I can't always expand as much as I want. There is also a limit to how much you can write in a blog entry before losing people's interest. I try to balance time, and length in my articles, but can't always get a perfect size and depth.
– Scott
Leave A Reply