[UPDATE: I have put this list under the tab at the top that says "The Big List". Click that tab to get the most up-to-date list of reasons to impeach President Barack Obama.]
After listening to Obama’s September 9, 2009 speech to Congress, trying to push HR 3200 again, I find that I must once again add to the Big List of causes to impeach Obama. The new cause is #27. I have updated it as follows.
The big list of 32 causes for impeaching President Barack Hussein Obama (aka Barry Soetoro).
The history of the current President of the United States of America, Barack Obama, is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these United States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
1. He has violated his oath to defend the US Constitution by exercising powers forbidden by the Constitution.
2. He has used public money to purchase private companies.
3. He has illegally tried to use public money to create publicly owned companies.
4. He has embezzled public money allocated by Congress for rescuing distressed private financial institutions, and used it to purchase automobile manufacturing companies.
5. He has given our public money to finance foreign automobile companies.
6. He has given our public money to a foreign state to finance their state-run oil company while refusing to allow us to develop our own oil resources.
7. He has violated the principle of balance of powers by usurping Congress’ role of law maker.
8. He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
9. He has ignored the laws protecting us from the insolvency of financial institutions.
10. He has demanded and implemented Tax-and-Spend laws that inevitably lead to economic collapse.
11. He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by appointing a judge to the Supreme Court based not on ability to interpret the Constitution, but on radical ideology and color of skin.
12. He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Czars to harass our people and eat out their substance.
13. He has violated the balance of powers by appointing Czars with far reaching powers who are accountable to no one but himself.
14. He has as a matter of patronage stolen private industries from shareholders and given them to workers’ unions.
15. He has substantially benefitted his political financial supporters by giving public money to foreign industries.
16. He has arranged very large unscrupulous deals with private companies to exchange public money for his political advertising.
17. He has attempted to create a public industry, a health insurance company, that would compete with existing and similar private industries in open defiance of the consent of the people, and the letter and intent of the Constitution.
18. He has attempted to annul free of speech by setting up an illegal reporting system for recording the names of dissenters and by publicly attacking private citizens who oppose him.
19. He has counted illegal aliens as citizens to skew his standing with Congress.
20. He has illegally fired Inspectors General who found wrong-doing with his political crones.
21. He has attempted to insert himself into even the most personal life experience, our end of life care.
22. He has attempted to refuse to pay for medical treatment for wounded soldiers.
23. He has refused his assent to Laws of Congress, exercising false powers of veto that are contrary and insubordinate to the Constitution.
24. He has contradicted and violated the rule of law regarding bankruptcy after forcing the failure of one of our largest automakers.
25. He has appointed a Secretary of State who is ineligible for office.
26. He has attempted to force all citizens into mandatory servitude to the government.
27. He has wasted our precious time and resources on his pet projects, while neglecting to attend to critical issues of the general welfare.
28. He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our lands, the merciless Islamo-fascist terrorists whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
29. He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
30. He has combined with Communist, Socialists and Fascists to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our American character, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation.
31. He has, in collusion with an insolent and irresponsible Congress, imposed Taxes against our consent not only on us, but also on our beloved children and our grandchildren denying them any representation.
32. He has nullified parts of our Constitution, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally our Form of Government.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms. Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated insults and injuries. A President whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant is unfit to be the Chief Executive of a free people.
NOTES:
1. He has violated his oath to defend the US Constitution by exercising powers forbidden by the Constitution.
Barack Obama seems to have a disdain for the US Constitution. Curiously he used to teach the Constitution. The then Senator Obama said of his time as a professor at the University of Chicago: “I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution.” It’s nice to know he respects the Constitution. It’s too bad he does not preserve, protect and defend the Constitution also. [1][2][3][4][5][6][8][11][12][14] [15][16][18][20][21][22][24][25][28][29] [31][37][38][39][40][43][44]
2. He has used public money to purchase private companies.
Obama’s administration purchased General Motors. The Constitution forbids the government from buying and running private industries.[2][38][40]
3. He has illegally tried to use public money to create publicly owned companies.
Obama’s government tried to create a health insurance company. The Constitution forbids the government from doing this.[3]
4. He has embezzled public money allocated by Congress for rescuing distressed private financial institutions, and used it to purchase automobile manufacturing companies.
The public tax money Obama used for the General Motors purchase was designated by law for the support of distressed financial companies. It was not to be used for anything else. Obama took Congresses money and spent it on a car company against the law of Congress.[4]
5. He has given our public money to finance foreign automobile companies.
The so-called “Cash for Clunkers” program redistributed the public tax money and gave it to car dealers. The overwhelming majority of the automobiles purchased were of foreign make. Much of the money for those automobiles wound up lining the pockets of foreign automobile manufacturers.[5]
6. He has given our public money to a foreign state to finance their state-run oil company while refusing to allow us to develop our own oil resources.
Obama financed a Brazilian oil company using public tax money to search for foreign oil in Brazil. The company, Brazil-owned Petrobras, was a wealthy state run company, perfectly capable of doing the search itself. This was effectively a gift of US tax money to the investors in the company and its owner. At the same time we have plenty of oil in the US to search for and produce, especially in Alaska, and yet Obama denies us the right to develop our own oil resources.[6][7]
7. He has violated the principle of balance of powers by usurping Congress’ role of law maker.
Even the more radical leftists in Congress complained about his power grab. According to the complaints of the leftist politicians Obama is usurping the power of lawmaker from Congress through his czars.[8]
8. He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
Obama’s financial plans for the recovery are based on communist, socialist and fascist ideas with no history of success, and every history of failure. While forcing these pre-doomed plans onto the economy, he would not execute economic practices that are know to work. He pursued tax-and-spend economic policies, while refusing supply-side, tax cut based plans. This has extended the suffering caused by the recession. He tried to help the issues in banking without having a clear plan.[9][23]
9. He has ignored the laws protecting us from the insolvency of financial institutions.
According to bankruptcy law, specifically the Prompt Corrective Action law, failed banks are supposed to close and go into receivership to the government. Obama ignored the law. Instead he propped up failing banks artificially using public tax money and nationalized them. The law exists for a reason. It protects the banking system from collapse.[51][52]
10. He has demanded and implemented Tax-and-Spend laws that inevitably lead to economic collapse.
Obama claimed promised to not raise taxes as President. He raised taxes by turning them into debt to be paid later. He is also trying to raise taxes by driving up the costs of energy which especially hurts the poor. [10]
11. He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by appointing a judge to the Supreme Court based not on ability to interpret the Constitution, but on radical ideology and color of skin.
Obama’s choice for Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor was certainly based on her latino heritage. She also has a history of radicalism that makes it clear that her legal judgment is heavily slanted. [11][24][25]
12. He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Czars to harass our people and eat out their substance.
Other Presidents have had czars, or the equivalent. Obama has created more of them than any other President. His czars are more radical and on the political fringe than those of any other President in history. Through them his is overriding the role of Congress as lawmaker.[13][26]
13. He has violated the balance of powers by appointing Czars with far reaching powers who are accountable to no one but himself.
The President’s cabinet needs to be approved by Congress. The Founders set things up this way for a reason. Obama’s czars form a shadow cabinet. Sometimes the czars have as much power as the cabinet members. The czars sometimes create laws which is a responsibility of Congress.[12][22]
14. He has as a matter of patronage stolen private industries from shareholders and given them to workers’ unions.
After Obama took over GM and Chrysler, he gave a large ownership of the companies to the Auto Workers unions. These unions were big supporters of his during the Presidential election.[14]
15. He has substantially benefitted his political financial supporters by giving public money to foreign industries.
George Soros is a huge supporter of Obama and his causes. Just days before Obama gave billions of public tax money to Brazil-owned Petrobras, Soros made a big financial move that earned him millions from Obama’s gift.[32][33]
16. He has arranged very large unscrupulous deals with private companies to exchange public money for his political advertising.
Obama arranged large potential deals with pharmacy companies. Those same companies gave large amounts of money to Obama for his presidential campaign. They have the ability to give more large amounts in the next election.[34][35]
17. He has attempted to create a public industry, a health insurance company, that would compete with existing and similar private industries in open defiance of the consent of the people, and the letter and intent of the Constitution.
This cause for impeachment, of course, is the imfamous H.R.3200 unconstitutional and very unpopular socialized medicine bill. The overwhelming majority of the US population doesn’t want it, yet he still insists on forcing it on us.[15][28][29][41][42]
18. He has attempted to annul free of speech by setting up an illegal reporting system for recording the names of dissenters and by publicly attacking private citizens who oppose him.
He set up a reporting system for people to email “tattle tales” about possibly incorrect or misleading information about H.R.3200 to his office. This would create a dampening effect on the people’s First Amendment right to discuss legislation. He also has openly and publicly attacked private citizens from his office. He is presently attempting to financially punish the forms of media, namely talk radio, which are most critical of him, effectively charging those media companies an unconscienable tax, one equal to their earnings, to stay in business. He intends to use those taxes to pay for equivalents to those forms of media that he controls.[16][21][37][39]
19. He has counted illegal aliens as citizens to skew his standing with Congress.
Obama is intending in the 2010 census to count all people in the US without questioning their citizenship status. This brings the US one step further in losing our national identity. This false counting of the people gives those districts with large numbers of illegal aliens greater representation in the House of Representatives. This is effectively turning the government over to a foreign power to some degree. This is an act of treason.[44]
20. He has illegally fired Inspectors General who found wrong-doing with his political crones.
Obama fired nspector General Walpin in an illegal manner after Walpin discovered legal improprieties committed by Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, one of Obama’s political supporters. Obama did not give a reason for his firing. In a like manner, he fired Inspector General David Hoffman after Hoffman found wrongdoings with a nephew of Chicago’s infamous Mayor Daley, who is a longtime political associate of Obama’s.[17][30]
21. He has attempted to insert himself into even the most personal life experience, our end of life care.
Part of Obama’s unconstitutional H.R.3200 contains a provision for government evaluation and counseling for end of life care and potentially provides a paid service that affects the income of the counselor, benefiting them if the patient dies. This is horribly immoral.[31]
22. He has attempted to refuse to pay for medical treatment for wounded soldiers.
In an unbelievably disgraceful act, Obama tried to talk the Veterans Administration into having US soldiers pay for their medical treatment for wounds received in combat using their own medical insurance.[36]
23. He has refused his assent to Laws of Congress, exercising false powers of veto that are contrary and insubordinate to the Constitution.
Congress passed a bill directing how money from the International Monetary Fund should be spend. Obama effectively vetoed sections of the bill, saying that they interfered with his ability to conduct foreign relations. According the Constitution Obama does not have the right to conduct foreign relations, except as provided by Congress. He invented a nonexistent right to a line item veto, and then justified it with a nonexistent right to conduct foreign relations which were themselves contrary to the requirements of Congress.[18]
24. He has contradicted and violated the rule of law regarding bankruptcy after forcing the failure of one of our largest automakers.
According to bankruptcy law, secured creditors get paid by the bankrupt organization before unsecured creditors. When Chrysler went into bankruptcy Obama gave the United Auto Workers $0.50 on the dollar for their unsecured debt, while giving the shareholders only $0.25 on the dollar for their secured debt. This is in complete contradiction to bankruptcy law.[19]
25. He has appointed a Secretary of State who is ineligible for office.
Obama appointed President Clinton’s wife, Hillary Clinton, to Secretary of State even though she is clearly illegal according to the Constitution. No Senator who votes for an increase in salary for a Cabinet office, such as Secretary of State, can be eligible for that office for a given period of time. Obama decided to ignore the Constitution, and appointed Clinton anyway.[54]
26. He has attempted to force all citizens into mandatory servitude to the government.
Obama originally planned to force every US citizen to do some kind of social work for the government for a minimum number of hours per year. Then he tried to make this applicable to only minors, which would also violate the child labor laws. [20][43]
27. He has wasted our precious time and resources on his pet projects, while neglecting to attend to critical issues of the general welfare.
On September 9, 2009 he addressed a joint session of Congress with a speech on HR 3200, trying to push socialized medicine onto the public. His greatest focus is on getting this project implemented. At the same time we are in the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression. He is neglecting the economy while attending to this pet socialized medicine project.
28. He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our lands, the merciless Islamo-fascist terrorists whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
Obama promised to close the prisons for terrorists in Guantamo Bay in Cuba. To close this he will have to bring the prisoners to the US. He has also been actively involved with US radicals as a “community organizer” where he taught, preached and encouraged social disruption that favored radical socialists, communists and other alien ideologies.[48][49][50][53]
29. He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
Obama has supported large complex bills that were produced for review only hours before Congress had the opportunity to vote on them. The members of Congress had no time to review the bills. The citizens did not have the opportunity to review and discuss them. The Constitution requires that the public be able to review and discuss legislation. Obama is required by his duty under his oath to veto all such bills.[45][46][47]
30. He has combined with Communist, Socialists and Fascists to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our American character, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation.
Most notably, the Communists, Socialists and Fascists are Obama czars. He has a long history of associating and supporting such individuals.
31. He has, in collusion with an insolent and irresponsible Congress, imposed Taxes against our consent not only on us, but also on our beloved children and our grandchildren denying them any representation.
Obama executed H.R.1, misnamed the “Stimulus Bill,” under the pretense that this bill would help fix the recession, when in reality it appears it had more to do with political payolla for support for his candidacy for President. The debt incurred by this bill and other similar bill will take generations to pay off. Future generations had no say in these imposed taxes, so this is a classic example of the crime of taxation without representation.
32. He has nullified parts of our Constitution, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally our Form of Government.
All of the above prove this.
[1] Hawkins, A.W.R. “Eleven States Declare Sovereignty Over Obama’s Action.” 23 February 2009. HumanEvents.com: Headquarters of the Conservative Underground. 19 August 2009 <http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=30807>.
[2] “Obama’s GM Plan Looks Like a Raw Deal:
Congress, not a secret task force, should decide the company’s fate.” 29 May 2009. The Wall Street Journal: Opinion Journal. 19 August 2009 <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124355327992064463.html>.
[3] Bader, Hans. “Legal Experts and Civil Rights Commission Attack Obama Health-Care Plan As Unconstitutional.” 18 August 2009. OpenMarket.org: Free Markets & Limited Government. 19 August 2009 <http://www.openmarket.org/2009/08/18/legal-experts-and-civil-rights-commission-attack-obama-health-care-plan-as-unconstitutional/>.
[4] Lucas, Fred. “Indiana Challenges Constitutionality of TARP Money for Auto Bailout.” 4 June 2009. CNSNews.com. 19 August 2009 <http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=49096>.
[5] Manning, Stephen. “Clunkers rebates benefit Asian automakers’ sales.” 14 August 2009. TheSunNews.com. 19 August 2009 <http://www.thesunnews.com/business/story/1022999.html?storylink=mirelated>.
[6] Palin, Sarah. “Your Tax Dollars Hard at Work: First Cars, Now Foreign Oil.” 19 August 2009. Facebook: Palin, Sarah. 19 August 2009 <http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=119471438434>.
[7] “Obama Underwrites Offshore Drilling: Too bad it’s not in US waters.” 18 August 2009. The Wall Street Journal: Opinion Journal. 19 August 2009 <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203863204574346610120524166.html>.
[8] Bresnahan, John. “Byrd: Obama in power grab.” 25 February 2009. Politico. 19 August 2009 <http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/19303.html>.
[9] Ferrara, Peter. “Obama Is Delaying the Economic Recovery.” 22 July 2009. The American Spectator. 19 August 2009 <http://spectator.org/archives/2009/07/22/obama-is-delaying-the-economic>.
[10] “Morning Bell: The Obama Tax and Spend Economy is Here.” 2 March 2009. The Heritage Foundation. 19 August 2009 <http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/02/morning-bell-the-obama-tax-and-spend-economy-is-here/>
[11] “Judicial Watch: Judge Sonia Sotomayor and the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund.” 17 June 2009. Judicial Watch. 19 August 2009 <http://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2009/SotomayorPRLDEFreport.pdf>
[12] Klukowski, Ken. “Senior Democrat Says Obama’s Czars Unconstitutional.” 15 June 2009. Townhall.com. 19 August 2009 <http://townhall.com/Columnists/KenKlukowski/2009/06/15/senior_democrat_says_obamas_czars_unconstitutional?page=full&comments=true>.
[13] “Q&A: Regarding these czars that President Barack Obama has been appointing, who pays their salary, who determines how much they make and are tax dollars involved at all?” 6 August 2009. Atlanta Journal-Constitution. 19 August 2009 <http://www.ajc.com/news/qa-regarding-these-czars-that-president-barack-obama-94867.html>
[14] “GM and Chrysler now part of Mayor Obama’s patronage farm.” 28 April 2009. Extreme Wisdom. 19 August 2009 <http://www.extremewisdom.com/?p=1949>.
[15] Sage, Bobbie Marie. “How The Critics Feel About Obama’s Plans to Reform Health Care: Is The Government Unfair Competition?” About.com. 19 August 2009 <http://personalinsure.about.com/od/health/a/aa042809a.htm>.
[16] “Cornyn accuses White House of compiling ‘enemies list’.” 6 August 2009. The Dallas Morning News. 19 August 2009 <http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/politics/state/stories/DN-cornynflag_06nat.ART.State.Edition1.4bb4d44.html>
[17] Bodnar, Jacob. “Obama’s Illegal Firing of Inspector General Walpin.” 17 June 2009. The Spartan Review. 19 August 2009 <http://thespartanreview.com/?p=340>.
[18] Eddlem, Thomas R. “Congress Rebukes Obama on Dictatorial Claim.” 11 July 2009. New American. 19 August 2009 <http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/congress/1402>.
[19] Barone, Michael. “White House puts UAW ahead of property rights.” 6 May 2009. The Washington Examiner. 19 August 2009 <http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/White-House-puts-UAW-ahead-of-property-rights-44415057.html>.
[20] Watson, Paul Joseph. “Obama Website Scrubs Mandatory Community Service Call.” 10 November 2008. Alex Jone’s Prison Planet. 19 August 2009 <http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-website-scrubs-mandatory-community-service-call.html>.
[21] “Records maintained on individuals.” Title 5. U.S. Code 552a. 19 August 2009 <http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00000552—a000-.html>.
[22] Albert, Richard. “Czars run counter to Barack Obama’s promises.” 20 July 2009. Politico. 19 August 2009 <http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25129.html>.
[23] Hall, Kevin G. “Obama’s econ failure: Still no plan to fix the banks.” 12 March 2009. McClatchy. 19 August 2009 <http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/63871.html>.
[24] Shapiro, Ilya. “Sotomayor Doesn’t Deserve a Supreme Court Seat.” 22 July 2009. The Cato Institute. 19 August 2009 <http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/07/22/sotomayor-doesnt-deserve-a-supreme-court-seat/>.
[25] Marx, Gary, and Long, Wendy E. “Sotomayor Nomination: Wrap-Up and Going Forward.” 6 August 2009. Obama’s Front Runners. 19 August 2009 <http://www.obamasfrontrunners.com/>.
[26] Braithwaite, Neil. “Beware the Czar’s of Obama!” 12 June 2009. Chron Watch. 19 August 2009 <http://www.chronwatch-america.com/articles/5057/1/Beware-the-Czars-of-Obama/Page1.html>.
[27] Mangru, Dan. “Does Anyone Care About the GM Shareholder?” 2 June 2009. MoneyNews.com. 19 August 2009 <http://moneynews.newsmax.com/dan_mangru/general_motors/2009/06/02/220550.html>.
[28] “How The Critics Feel About Obama’s Plans to Reform Health Care.” 25 July 2009.Insurance Guide. 19 August 2009 <http://insurance.hirby.com/how-the-critics-feel-about-obamas-plans-to-reform-health-care/>.
[29] McCollister, Rolfe. “Obama’s health plan creates monopoly.” 27 July 2009.Business Report.com. 19 August 2009 <http://www.businessreport.com/news/2009/jul/27/obamas-health-plan-creates-monopoly/>.
[30] Kass, John. “Obama’s political play should shock no one.” 21 June 2009.Chicago Tribue. 19 August 2009 <http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-kass-21-jun21,0,1177440.column>.
[31] Palin, Sarah. “Statement on the Current Health Care Debate.” 7 August 2009. Facebook: Palin, Sarah. 19 August 2009 <http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=113851103434>.
[32] “OBAMA BACKS OFF-SHORE DRILLING IN BRAZIL! U.S. TO LOAN $2 BILLION TO FINANCE EXPLORATION OF THE HUGE OFFSHORE DISCOVERY IN BRAZIL’S TUPI OIL FIELD UPDATE: A SOROS CONNECTION?” 19 August 2009.RightVoices.com. 19 August 2009 <http://rightvoices.com/2009/08/19/obama-backs-off-shore-drilling-in-brazil-u-s-to-loan-2-billion-to-finance-exploration-of-the-huge-offshore-discovery-in-brazil’s-tupi-oil-field-update-a-soros-connection/>.
[33] Blount, Jeb and Weiss, Miles. “Soros Hedge Fund Bought Petrobras Stake Worth $811 Million.” 15 August 2009.Bloomberg.com. 19 August 2009 <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=aFHPjfeUvtl8>.
[34] Grimm, Ryan. “Internal Memo Confirms Big Giveaways In White House Deal With Big Pharma.” 13 August 2009.Huffington Post. 19 August 2009 <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/13/internal-memo-confirms-bi_n_258285.html>.
[35] Kirkpatrick, David D. “Drug Industry to Run Ads Favoring White House Plan.” 8 August 2009.New York Times. 19 August 2009 <http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/health/policy/09lobby.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss>.
[36] “Change You Can Believe In – Obama’s Crimes Against Veterans.” 19 March 2009. Judging Truth. 19 August 2009. <http://www.judgingtruth.com/2009/03/change-you-can-believe-in-obamas-crimes-against-veterans/>.
[37] “President Barack Obama Crimes! Attacking America’s Private Citizens.” devils-best-friend.com. 19 August 2009 http://www.devils-best-friend.com/President-Barack-Obama-Crimes-Against-Americans.html>.
[38] Jeffrey, Terence P. “The Illegal, Unconstitutional Bush-Obama Auto Bailout.” 1 April 2009.HumanEvents.com. 20 August 2009 <http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=31301>.
[39] “ACLJ Calls on President Obama to Repudiate White House Comments Calling on Americans to “Flag” and Report “Fishy” Comments Opposing Health Care Plan.” 6 August 2009.Business Wire. 20 August 2009 <http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20090806005755&newsLang=en>.
[40] Lucas, Fred. “36 Congressmen Ask Obama to Return Authority Over Auto Bailout to Congress–But White House Says Its Not Over-Reaching Its Power.” 29 May 2009.CNSNews.com. 20 August 2009 <http://www.cnsnews.com/public/Content/article.aspx?RsrcID=48791>.
[41] Rosenbloom, Frank S., M.D. “The Failed Promises of Government Funded Health Care.” 7 July 2009.American Thinker. 21 August 2009 <http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/07/the_failed_promises_of_governm.html>.
[42] “Why an Obamacare “Public Plan” should be an easy target.” 24 June 2009.Patterico’s Pontification. 21 August 2009 <http://patterico.com/2009/06/24/why-an-obamacare-“public-plan”-should-be-an-easy-target/>.
[43] “America Serves.” change.gov: The office of the President Elect. 22 August 2009 <http://change.gov/americaserves/>.
[44] Baker, John S. and Stonecipher, Elliott. “Our Unconstitutional Census.” 9 August 2009.Wall Street Journal: Opinion Journal. 21 August 2009 <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204908604574332950796281832.html>.
[45] “Democrat’s Midnight “Stimulus” Power Play.” 11 February 2009.House Republican Leader John Boehner. 22 August 2009 <http://republicanleader.house.gov/blog/?p=435e>.
[46] Klein, Philip. “Stimulus Bill Becomes Available ‘Round About Midnight.” 13 February 2009.The American Spectator. 22 August 2009 <http://spectator.org/blog/2009/02/13/stimulus-bill-becomes-availabl>.
[47] Hair, Connie. “Republicans Shut Out of Stimulus Conference Negotiations.” 11 February 2009.HumanEvents.com. 22 August 2009 <http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=30667>.
[48] Lewis, James. “Barack Obama and Alinsky’s Rules for Psychopaths.” 25 September 2008.American Thinker. 22 August 2009 <http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_alinskys_rule.html>.
[49] “Camp Alinsky Obama.” 4 October 2008.The Real Barack Obama. 22 August 2009 <http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/2008/10/04/camp-alinsky-obama/>.
[50] Rowley, James. “Obama’s Plan to Close Guantanamo Forces Decision About Inmates .” 3 December 2008.Bloomber.com. 22 August 2009 <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=azraH32qUfn0>.
[51] “Camp Alinsky Obama.” 5 April 2009.PBS. 23 August 2009 <http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/blog/2009/04/william_k_black_on_the_prompt.html>.
[52] Black, William K. “Why Is Geithner Continuing Paulson’s Policy of Violating the Law?” 23 February 2009.The Huffington Post. 23 August 2009 <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-k-black/why-is-geithner-continuin_b_169234.html>.
[53] Foon, Rhee. “Cheney rejoins battle over interrogations” 25 August 2009.Boston.com. 25 August 2009 <http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2009/08/cheney_rejoins.html>.
[54] “Rodearmel v. Clinton.”Judicial Watch. 5 September 2009 <http://www.judicialwatch.org/rodearmel-v-clinton>.
Stumble it!
12 users commented in " The Big List of reasons to impeach is updated after the Obama Sept. 9, 2009 address to Congress "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackI agree but to impeach him is to verify he is a U.S. Citizen which all his actions show us that he wants to destroy our Country's Soverienty. We need him to prove that he is or is'nt a U.S. Citizen by allowing us to see all his Academic records, Indonesian records and his Long Form of is Birth Certificate to prove he is a Citizen of our United States thus a legitimate President or a Usuroer as I believe he is.
The state of Hawaii says that he was born in Hawaii. Until I have substantial proof they are lying, I will accept what they say as true.
What bothers a number of us though is why "Mr. Transparent" refuses to divulge this kind of information about himself like every other office holder does. It isn't just that won't show is birth certificate, it's the fact that he is hiding all of his history, his school records, etc. Much of the story he has told about his past is just made up.
This all suggests that he is either hiding something, or he is paranoid. If he is hiding something, we need to find out what it is. If he is paranoid, he is of a state of mind that makes him poorly suited to be President.
My question to all the birthers is: Why are you spending so much time and effort on this, when its obvious he should be impeached for the reasons I've given in The Big List? It is a fact that he should be impeached. The fact is well documented on my Big List page. The problem is getting the members of the House of Representatives to fulfill their oaths. They are not fulfilling their own oaths which requires them to impeach the guy.
I AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY. HOW DO WE BEGIN THE IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS?? OBAMA DOES NOT UPHOLE NOR RESPECT OUR CONSTITUTION. I DO NOT THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CAN GET THROUGH THE REMAINING 3 YRS OF THIS PRESENT ADMINISTRATION. I ALSO BELIEVE PELOSI, REID, FRANK & DODD SHOULD BE IMPRISONED FOR TREASONOUS ACTS AGAINST THE CONSITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.
Is there any law if congress wont do thier job on starting impeachment of Obama on what other options the citizens of the USA can do?
Questions on Impeaching Barack Hussein Obama
Guten Tag!
Dear Upright, Honest, Moral, and Constitutionally Firm Citizens Who Read This Long Commentary:
Perhaps some of you have the resolve to tackle my questions. Perhaps you have better connections, resources, and experience than I have. I have written to 100 US constitutional law professors in the United States of America and legal organizations. I have not received an answer from them, except for one constitutional law professor. I shall tell you what he summarily said at the end of this commentary. I shall keep their names a secret, for the present at least. in order to protect the guilty. I have followed your quest and the quest of other internet commentators to rectify the deplorable breaking of the Supreme Law of the Land by Barack Hussein Obama, The Usurper of Republican Democracy – the acronym is valid – and other elected officials who took oaths of office to protect the United States Constitution from all dangers domestic and foreign. I wish you all the greatest of success in your undertakings.
I live in Germany. But I am not German. I am an American citizen. I have no background in US constitutional law other than an undergraduate course that I took over twenty-five years ago. I understand enough legalistic English and logic to know that a Certification of Live Birth and a real Birth Certificate are not the same document. I know that both documents, indeed, all documents including Selective Service Registrations and university degrees can be forged. (When money is involved, there is a way! Barack Hussein Obama has the money behind him. It is not his money, but that of those who seek to destroy the United States of America.) I also know the difference between a native born citizen, a naturalized citizen, and a natural born citizen. They are not the same. Consequently, I have some questions concerning the breaking of the law of the Constitution of the United States of America. The US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land. The questions are:
1. Is the breaking of the law of the US Constitution a crime?
2. If so, what kind of crime is it? Would it fall under misdemeanor?, criminal statute? civil statute? Are the breakings of the laws in the different Articles of the Constitution different types of crimes? Is it not treason?
3. Can the Supreme Court of the United States take the initiative on its own and investigate and find someone guilty of breaking the law of the US Constitution and impose a penalty, perhaps for perjury and/or treason?
4. If a penalty is imposed, what authority is there to make sure that the penalty is executed?
5. If a person intentionally breaks the law of the US Constitution but is never accused of doing so, is that person still a non-criminal. My reasoning of logic tells me NO. That person is and will always be a criminal ad infinitum. We can devise an example of the logic as follows:
Our major premise is: All X are Y. This being can never be undone.
Our minor premise is: All Z are X. This being can never be undone.
Our conclusion is: All Z are Y. This being can never be undone.
The relationships of these beings cannot be changed. Never! Not now! Not in the future! Not retroactively!
It is a law of Nature that is just as true as the sum of one plus one is two.
This will always be the case into infinity.
There is no law that can break this rule of logic.
It is the law of Nature (God).
According to the philosophy of logic the person is and will always be guilty.
Now for a practical application:
As an example that pertains to the eligibility status of the President of the United States, I reiterate Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the American Constitution states that
"No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States."
The Constitution of the United States of America is a public document. It is not a secret document. The power comes from "We the people." Therefore, the requirements of the Articles of the US Constitution are public and not secret.
Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 thus states that along with the age and resident requirements, the other absolutely necessary requirement to become President of the United States of America is that the candidate must be a natural born citizen. In every law book and all theories of law that I have researched, natural born means those born in the country, of parents who are both citizens of the country. In the case of the United States of America, the child's parents must both be American citizens when the child is born in order that the child can meet the qualifications to candidate as a future President of the United States of America. My information is that Barack Hussein Obama's mother was not of legal age to possess United States of America citizenship when she gave birth to her son, and we know for a fact that Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was a Kenyan/British citizen at the time of the son's birth. Therefore, the place of birth is not relevant, only the natural born qualification is relevant.
My logic and the logic of the Law of Nature and the Supreme Law of the Land, tells me:
- THE MAJOR PREMISE IS: a person must be eligible to be President of the United States.
- THE MINOR PREMISE IS: Barack Hussein Obama's eligibility to be President of the United States is not identified (established, shown to be true, demonstrated, manifested, evinced, documented, backed up, supported, upheld, sustained, affirmed, confirmed or any other synonym).
- THE CONCLUSION IS: The only conclusion is that Barack Hussein Obama cannot be President of the United States of America.
6. How can Barack Hussein Obama be President of the United States of America when the logic of the situation says otherwise and the Supreme Law of the Land says otherwise? Barack Hussein Obama evidently and I maintain intentionally broke the Supreme Law of the Land.
Surely this cannot be a matter of Constitutional interpretation. The Supreme Law of the Land is explicit and in this matter leaves no leeway for interpretation. A candidate for the Presidency of the United States of America is either natural born or not. If the candidate is not a natural born citizen, that person cannot candidate for the office. If he does he is criminal and all of those who backed him up in being a candidate for office are accomplices in the crime.
7. What are the legal situations concerning all laws, appointments, presidential decrees that Barack Hussein Obama has signed? If he is not President of the United States of America because both the logic of the situation and the Supreme Law of the Land say otherwise, how can they be legal? It seems to me that they cannot be legal.
8. Furthermore, why should any of the following government officials who took an oath to uphold and protect the Constitution of the United States of America: elected representatives, senators, law officials, governors, state representatives, and state senators, accept the laws, nominees, and decrees as signed by Barack Hussein Obama as being official? There is no legality involved in his signature.
9. The logic above and the logic of the Supreme Law of the Land tell me that Barack Hussein Obama has committed a criminal offense. If Barack Hussein Obama remains the unconstitutional President of the United States of America, does this not mean that regardless of what time in the future, indeed, at any time in the future, Barack Hussein Obama is still a criminal? Ergo: Once a criminal always a criminal?
10. Moreover, since Barack Hussein Obama does not meet the natural born citizen requirement, and he knows it, the violation of the Constitution was intended. When he swore the presidential oath that is dictated by the Constitution, he swore to uphold the Constitution. Was he swearing to uphold his own violation of the Supreme Law of the Land or was he swearing to uphold the legality of the Constitution? He was swearing to uphold the legality of the Constitution and he knew that he had committed a crime by breaking this reality. Because Barack Hussein Obama is not indicting himself for breaking the law of the Constitution, Barack Hussein Obama is placing himself above the Supreme Law of the Land. This in itself is against the law of the Constitution. Is this action not considered a high crime – treason – against the United States of America?
This alone is ground enough for the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama and the legal, constitutional process of removing him from office. I see no reason why Barack Hussein Obama cannot be impeached, other than the fact that the Republican Representatives and Senators do not have a majority in Congress. Impeachment would not be admitting that Barack Hussein Obama is an American citizen. If one considers the situation seriously, Barack Hussein Obama's being an unconstitutional resident could result in the United States military resolving the unconstitutional status. There is nothing in the US Constitution, as far as I can see, that would prohibit the process. In fact, it would be a process similar to that which the Supreme Court of Honduras legally implemented according to the rules of the Honduras' Constitution to oust their life-time-seeking-president Manuel Zelaya on 28 June 2009. The procedure was totally legal!
11. If one article of the Constitution of the United States can be broken and go non-punishable, why cannot all articles be broken and thus make the whole Constitution null and void?
12. If the breaking of the law of the US Constitution is not a crime and non-punishable, and one places oneself above the Supreme Law of the Land, as if to say the end justifies the means and the document means nothing, then what is the sense of having a Constitution?
Now to return to the statement that I received from a professor of United States Constitutional Law. His summary conclusion is: "But I don't see how anyone can say Obama committed a crime by accepting the office certified to him by the electors."
By electors he means both the electoral college and the American electorate.
I am flabbergasted at this answer coming from a professor of United States Constitutional Law and a Harvard University graduate. It reminds me of the statement that is attributed to the American author James Barnes (1866-1936) that says: “You can always tell a Harvard man, but you can’t tell him much.” I state it with respect to the said professor, regardless of the fact that any reader of this commentary might have graduated from Harvard University.
What is/are your opinion(s)?
Perhaps you will have the fortitude to take my questions seriously and take the time to search for some answers and support all endeavors to unseat Barack Hussein Obama and his Fascist Appointees Representing Tyrannical Socialism. This acronym is also valid. Socialism stinks and it is full of hot air!
I have written all of you readers in blogger land a personal commentary. Herewith I state that I am a three-time post-graduate academic and I have the paper trail to prove my legal existence and academic status.
I thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely and Respectfully,
Salve
[...] The Big List of reasons to impeach is updated after the Obama Sept. 9, 2009 address to Congress (559 views) [...]
You are a bunch of ignorant racist fools. You are manipulating facts, which is typical of The Wrong (formerly referred to as the right). He was born is the US…give it a rest. I guess everyone's birth certificate is suspect. Mine says I was born in the US, but maybe I was really born is some fern country. Get a life.
It's complete clear to me and millions of others, Incredulous, that you are absolutely and profoundly insane.
He has issued another Presidential Executive Order (Decree, Holy Writ) that prohibits anyone from asking the President of the United States for his information. We might be able to impeach him for issuing that order or if not, for a bunch of other unconstitutional orders he's issued. This looks like a bill of attainder to me.
The Governor of the State of Hawaii (a fervent Obama sycophant) has admitted that he can't find the famed birth certificate. This backs up a similar assertion from a former worker in that particular government office.
I think he's an impostor and a usurper. I also think he's a strutting little Mussolini wannabe, who would like very much to be President for Life. Don't be surprised if we don't have an election in 2012. Especially if we don't call Obama down on these lawless executive orders.
The ultimate responsibility for impeachment lies with the House of Representatives.
They draw up the charges and the Senate becomes he Court to hear the charges. It is plainly obvious with the likes of Reid and Pelosi and Frank and Waxman and other of that ilk would never convict this pretender. Lets hope in 2012 this changes. But the multitude of idiots who voted this individual into office are still out there. Do not forget our southern border is still wide open, thanks to him and Bush. Do not forget also that this person has sued Arizona for trying to protect themselves. The money behind feels pretty confident. The number of illegal aliens in this Country when he took office was around 20 million, now it is estimated to be at least 30 million. He wants to make supporters of them all.
Fern country? Really, did you finish school somewhere? You are typical of the very people who put Obama into office. The word you were trying to spell is "foreign"
The House needs to impeach the Marxist thug, even if the Senate will not follow through, if for no other reason than to get up and in his face and to weaken him politically. I'm less concerned about Pelosi now than I am with Boehner and the other limp wristed Republicans that won't go after the guy. The leftists need to go, preferably straight to jail, and so should the weaker Republicans for complicity.
Leave A Reply